Digital Economic Transformation: Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Countries
Keywords:
Learning strategies, Technology, Learning outcomes, Experimental methods, EducationAbstract
This study aims to develop effective learning strategies by utilizing technology to improve student learning outcomes. The study used a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental method through a pretest-posttest control group design. The subjects of the study consisted of two classes selected by purposive sampling, namely the experimental group using technology-based learning strategies and the control group using conventional methods. Data were collected through learning outcome tests, perception questionnaires, and observation sheets. The results of the study showed that the application of technology-based learning strategies was more effective in improving student learning outcomes compared to conventional methods. This is evidenced by the results of the t-test which showed a p value <0.05, which means there is a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group. In addition, simple regression analysis shows a positive relationship between the application of technology-based learning strategies and improved learning outcomes. This study provides theoretical contributions in the development of learning strategies that integrate technology, as well as providing practical implications for educators in implementing more effective methods. The results of this study are in line with the theory that the use of technology in learning can increase student motivation, engagement, and understanding.
References
Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80-97.
Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. Jossey-Bass.
Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26.
Huang, R., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook on Educational Communications and Technology (4th ed.). Springer.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking (2nd ed.). Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and Development Research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Routledge.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Miranda Karmila, Suci Syahana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






