Corporate Responsibilities in Intellectual Property Rights Disputes in the Digital Age
Keywords:
Intellectual Property Rights, Digital Companies, Legal Liability, Digital Disputes, IPR RegulationAbstract
In the digital era, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) violations are increasing along with the rapid development of technology and digital platforms. Digital companies, as service providers and content facilitators, have a responsibility to prevent and handle IPR disputes. This study aims to analyze the extent of the company's responsibility in resolving IPR disputes and the challenges faced in its implementation in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal approach with legal analysis of applicable regulations, case studies of several digital companies, and interviews with legal experts and related stakeholders. The results of the study show that digital companies have preventive responsibilities through content filtering systems and internal regulations, as well as responsive responsibilities through take-down mechanisms and cooperation with legal authorities. However, challenges such as lack of legal certainty, weak enforcement of regulations, and limited monitoring technology are still major obstacles in resolving IPR disputes in Indonesia. As a recommendation, this study suggests stricter regulatory reform, the implementation of more sophisticated monitoring technology, and increased legal awareness for users and providers of digital services. With these steps, it is hoped that the digital ecosystem in Indonesia can be more conducive to the protection of IPR and create a balance between the interests of copyright owners, internet users, and digital companies.
References
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire. Harvard University Press.
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press.
Zehr, H. (1990). Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Herald Press.
Lessig, L. (2001). The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. Random House.
Samuelson, P. (2004). “Intellectual Property and the Digital Economy: Why the Anti-Circumvention Regulations Need to Be Reformed.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 14(2), 519–567.
Solum, L. B. (2015). “Artificial Intelligence and the Law: Exploring Issues of Intellectual Property and Liability.” Harvard Law Review, 128(4), 1134–1162.
Sunstein, C. R. (1996). Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. Oxford University Press.
WIPO. (2019). Guide on the Licensing of Copyright and Related Rights. World Intellectual Property Organization.
Yu, P. K. (2011). “Digital Copyright and the Regulation of Online Platforms.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 6(5), 271–289.
Kaplow, L. & Shavell, S. (2002). Fairness Versus Welfare. Harvard University Press.
Komisi HAKI Indonesia. (2020). Perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Era Digital. Jakarta: Kemenkumham RI.
Posner, R. A. (2003). Economic Analysis of Law. Aspen Publishers.
Shapiro, M. (1981). Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. University of Chicago Press.
Statman, D. (2017). “Moral and Legal Responsibility in the Digital Age.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 37(3),
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dewandaru Dewandaru, Enes Gamya, Guntur Ismawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






